Q:

Are trail runners suitable for hiking without a pack?

I'm discovering that my late-fortyish feet are inexorably growing longer and wider, and the hiking boots that served me well two years ago are now giving me blisters and scrunched toenails. Companions on a recent Sierra backcountry hike were wearing low-cut trail shoes that looked only slightly more rugged than running shoes, and which allowed their wearers to pretty much dance over the rocks and scree without twisting ankles. For hiking relatively rugged trails without a backpack, what sort of characteristics should one look for in such shoes? And, while I'm here, can one backpack in 'em? Richard Truckee, California

Sep 18, 2003
Outside
Outside Magazine
A: Actually, those low-cut trail shoes didn't let them "dance over rocks and scree without twisting ankles." Some good luck, and maybe excellent connective tissue, is what kept their ankles in place. So be careful: What you see isn't necessarily what you want to emulate.

Not that low-cuts don't have a place in the outdoors. They're light, agile, and comfortable, and some people can indeed get away with wearing them even with a pretty heavy pack. Better still, packs are getting lighter as gear makers find ways to shave off ounces and even pounds. So it's true that we need less ankle support than we did perhaps ten years ago. That said, I think most people under-boot a little, seeking comfort and forgetting that the boot also offers protection. My take on this, though, is probably in part due to my own infirmities. A high-school ankle injury suffered all those years ago came back to haunt me a while back and now requires frequent use of an ankle brace. So the thought of hiking in low-cuts makes me cringe.

Still, as you mention, not wearing a pack does make a difference. Even I still do a fair amount of boulder-hopping with trail runners or their equivalent. So you might take a look at a shoe such as the very popular Lowa Tempest Lo ($100; www.lowaboots.com), a low-cut shoe that has a surprising amount of heft. Very stable, too, which helps keep ankles upright. Montrail's TRS Comp ($95; www.montrail.com) is another stable, sturdy low-cut shoe that's popular with trail runners and light hikers. Another really good shoe for boulder-hopping is the Five Ten Mountain Master ($86; www.fiveten.com), which has super-grippy soles and a supportive polyurethane midsole.

That said, I also like many of the new-generation "mid-cut" boots, which are light yet offer a little more support. Among the best of these: Asolo's FSN 95 ($150; www.asolo.com), which has proven very popular, and includes a Gore-Tex liner as well. Tecnica's Spirit Mid GTX ($150; www.tecnicausa.com) sorta splits the difference between high- and low-cut boots. Very agile, but supportive.

Anyway, that's my take on it. Get yourself some trekking poles, too—they're wonderful for keeping your balance and protecting knees and ankles.

Filed To: Gear Guy

More at Outside

Not Now

Need a Gear Fix?

Open email. Get latest gear. Repeat.

Thank you!