Q:

Is separate sleepwear essential for backpacking?

I learned most of my wilderness know-how from experienced paddlers, who taught me that you should always have a set of dry clothes set aside for sleeping. Now, I'm branching out into hiking and wondering if that advice still holds true, or if I can shave a few ounces off my poor back and knees (and save a few bucks, to boot) by wearing the se polar fleece day and night. What do you think? Catherine Montreal, Quebec

Jun 21, 2004
Outside
Outside Magazine

Silkweight T-shirt

A: I think it all depends on your smell tolerance, Catherine. Because while it's certainly true that having a dry change of long underwear at night is a good thing—hell, even a great thing—it really isn't essential for hiking. The only truly limiting factor will be the amount of odor buildup over the course of a few days. But then, when I was climbing Denali several years back, I wore the same long underwear for the better part of three weeks. So did my climbing partner, Tim. And neither of us fainted from noxious fumes (the long underwear was tossed and never used again, however).

As for fleece jackets and the like, there's absolutely no point in carrying a spare. The stuff dries quickly, and it's overkill to have an extra when you're backpacking.

Still, for summer use there is one thing I like to do, and it doesn't add much weight to the kit: I pack in a Patagonia Silkweight T-shirt ($30; www.patagonia.com), plus bottoms made from the company's same Capilene fabric ($32). I try to reserve this setup for nighttime, although of course it can come in handy during the day too. But having clean sleepwear does help keep the sleeping bag cleaner, plus it's just a little more comfortable. And the light Patagonia stuff weighs just ounces and takes up as much space as a pair of socks.

Filed To: Base Layer

More at Outside

Not Now

Need a Gear Fix?

Open email. Get latest gear. Repeat.

Thank you!