THE MOST IMPRESSIVE feat of strength I've ever witnessed—besides the time my girlfriend twisted the cap off the jelly jar when I couldn't—was performed at a class in a small Salt Lake City gym by David Banks, a 38-year-old, 149-pound professional rock climber who dead-lifted nearly three times his body weight before my eyes.
Don't you have to be built like a Ukrainian power lifter to do that? Apparently not. That startling feat led to my first epiphany about strength training: that power and size don't always, or even often, correlate, and that developing strength pays huge dividends for athletes of almost any stripe.
"Most endurance athletes are weak," says Joe Vigil, 80, a storied running coach in Mammoth Lakes, California, and author of the training book Road to the Top. "The closer you can come to a 100 percent effort in your training, the more pure strength you're going to develop for your game."
Like a lot of people, I always assumed that weight lifting meant I would get bigger and that the extra mass would penalize me in any kind of endurance activity. But strength, as Vigil explained, has less to do with muscle size than what he calls "neural enervation"—that is, the brain's ability to turn on muscle fibers when they're asked to exert force.
Untrained muscle tissue recruits only about a third of its available fibers, says Vigil. By exposing muscles to heavier loads or higher-intensity exercises, however, you train them to tap into more of the muscle you already have. Even more compelling is the fact that, depending on your fitness goals, you may need to go heavy on the weights as little as once or twice a year for a few weeks in order to realize lasting improvement.
Inspired by my untapped potential, not to mention Banks's Mighty Mouse impersonation, I set up a monthlong DIY program, focusing on Vigil's "big three" exercises for athletes: the back squat, bench press, and dead lift. I spent the first two weeks simply rehearsing, until I could do 20 unweighted reps with perfect form, before adding weight.
Respectable targets for men like me who want to max out look something like this: bench your body weight, back-squat 1.5 times your body weight, and dead-lift twice your body weight. Since I'm a 190-pound "legs and lungs" athlete (my main sports are cycling, skiing, and soccer), the first time I tried to dead-lift any significant load, I was sure that my arms were going to tear from their sockets and I was going to hose down the gym in spurting torrents of blood. It was clear that, while I'd spent years working on my motor, I'd completely neglected my boat.
The strength came quickly, though. After a couple of weeks I maxed out at 170 pounds on the bench, 210 in the back squat, and an even 320 in the dead lift. Even though I was stronger, my body weight was the same.
Comments
i do mostly rockclimbing and some lifting but i wa worried that lifting will be disadvantage to a rock climber since the muscle mass is extra load to carry. i wonder if lifting heavy effected climbing performance of David Banks . Is it better to go with low rep high load or just go high rep with low weight ?
Flag This