Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Court Backs EPA Global Warming Rules

Landmark appeal upholds CO2 regulation

By: @catyenders)
Gila National Forest, New Mexico

A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., ruled Tuesday that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was "unambiguously correct" in creating the first-ever regulations aimed at reducing greenhouse gases. The 2009 rules, challenged by business interests, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and several states, set limits on industrial and automotive emissions under the Clean Air Act. Opponents of the regulation argued that greenhouse gases did not endanger human health or welfare and that limiting emissions would hurt businesses. In the court's ruling, the three-judge panel said the EPA had sufficient evidence to conclude that human emissions were, in fact, contributing to climate change. "Today's ruling by the court confirms that the EPA's common sense solutions to address climate pollution are firmly anchored in science and law," said Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense Fund.

Read more at Bloomberg Businessweek

Want the latest news from the outdoors?   

More at Outside

Subscribe
to Outside
Now with
iPad Access

Magazine Cover

Plus 2 Outside Buyer's Guides included with your purchase!

GUIDES

Find the Best

Current Issue Outside Magazine

Subscribe and get a great deal! Two free Buyer's Guides plus a free GoLite Sport Bottle. Monthly delivery of Outside—your ultimate resource for today's active lifestyle. All that and big savings!

Free Newsletters

Dispatch This week's featured articles, reviews, and videos. Sent twice weekly.
News From the Field The most important breaking news from around the Web. Sent daily.
Gear of the Day The latest products, reviews, and editors' picks. Coming soon.
Outside Partners Outside-approved deals and special offers from select partners. Sent occasionally.

Ask a Question

Our gear experts await your outdoor-gear-related questions. Go ahead, ask them anything.

* We might edit your question for length or clarity. If it's not about gear, we'll just ignore it.