Ted Ligety doesn’t think so. The three-time World Cup giant-slalom champ and Olympic gold medalist sounded off in mid-August after trying the longer, straighter skis mandated by the International Ski Federation (FIS). “I finally had the chance to try a prototype of the 40m GS skis,” Ligety wrote on his blog while in New Zealand. “And quite frankly, they suck.”

The clamor started on July 18 when the FIS announced new alpine equipment rules. Beginning with the 2012–13 season, skiers in downhill, super-G, and giant-slalom events will be required to use longer skis with a longer turning radius. Generally speaking, the smaller a ski’s radius, the easier and tighter it will turn without losing speed due to skidding. As a result, over the years courses have been configured that allow skiers to cut clean, beautiful turns without sacrificing speed. Of the three disciplines, giant slalom skis like those Ligety uses got the greatest overhaul: a jump from the current 27-meter minimum radius to a whopping 40.

“It would be like going from a sports car to driving a semi truck,” Ligety told Outside. “It’s just such a huge difference.”

The last time ski manufacturers made skis with a 40-meter radius en masse was the 1980s. So why is the FIS making this change now? After launching an Injury Surveillance System in 2006 officials became concerned with injury rates. From 2006 through 2010, FIS found that each season nearly a third of World Cup racers suffered an injury, and close to 20 percent missed more than four weeks of competition as a result, with knee injuries being the most prevalent. They said consistent detailed statistics on the causes of skier injuries prior to that were limited and poorly documented.

Skiers themselves point to lower injury rates and say the equipment is not to blame. Ligety claims that in the past two years there have been only three injuries among the top 30 World Cup GS skiers—two knee injuries and one ankle, caused by a hooked gate, and poor course conditions, respectively.

Yet for all the talk of injury rates and statistics, the decision to update the regulations wasn’t based on hard numbers. It was based on interviews. In 2010, FIS collaborated with the University of Salzburg, which in turn interviewed 63 World Cup experts, such as coaches, athletes, officials, and organizers. Together they decided that equipment changes were the best way to minimize risk. FIS, the university, and several ski manufacturers, such as Fischer, Rossignol, and Marker Voelkl, further used the qualitative information from those interviews to define radius and length specifications for a quiver of prototype skis. Active and former World Cup racers like Peter Struger and Marco Büchel tested those prototypes, and the university measured the skis’ slip percentage, aggressiveness, and turn force. Of the three GS prototype skis tested, the FIS selected the one with the safest measurements: more slip, less aggressive, less turn force.

By this summer, the FIS had gathered enough information to make a change. The reaction was not exactly what they expected.

“FIS rumbles about trying to capture a bigger audience,” U.S. Ski Team member Steven Nyman wrote on his blog. “This move clearly won’t attract more people to the sport. The difference in power, athleticism, speed is drastic.”