Gear Guy

Naos 45 Backpack     Photo: courtesy, Arc’teryx

Q:

Which backpacks are Marine Corps worthy?

I am the project officer in charge of the design, development, and procurement of all Individual Load Bearing Equipment for the United States Marine Corps. We’re currently performing market research on backpacks with approximately 2,500 cubic inches of capacity. Durability and comfort is top priority. I would like to purchase several different styles of backpacks to study the best ideas out there. Which manufacturers and packs should I consider? John Quantico, Virginia

A:You mean I have the chance to influence what our troops might use in the field in five or ten years? A frightening thought, in a way. But I accept the challenge!

If I were to look at a range of packs in an effort to devise the perfect pack for today’s military, here are the makes I would look at, and why:

Gregory: These packs offer an excellent blend of performance, price, and durability. That company’s Maven pack is a little bigger than you mention (3,000 cubic inches, $219), but it reflects much of the current thinking in a medium-sized pack. gregorypacks.com

Osprey: For some really innovative design and a lot of comfort in a very lightweight pack, look no further. Its packs feature a near-custom fit through a heat-formable waist belt, and they have excellent back ventilation. The Aether 60 is a good example, though, again, is a little bigger than what you specify (3,800 cubic inches). It retails for $219. ospreypacks.com

Granite Gear: These are very tough packs that already have a faint air of military readiness. And they’re also excellent load carriers, and very adaptable. Take a look at the Precipice (2,800 cubic inches, $155). granitegear.com

Arc’teryx: What this company is doing may represent the future of backpacks. It makes extensive use of thermal-forming, for instance, and in its Naos series has pioneered packs that are fully welded, not sewn. This allows the creation of a pack that is fully waterproof without the need for a pack cover or other add-on. But, the technology is expensive. Get a Naos 45 (2,700 cubic inches, $400). arcteryx.com

GoLite: These guys are about the best around at making very light packs that still meet real-world needs of durability and load-carrying ability. Buy the Lite-Speed (3,000 cubic inches, $130). golite.com

The North Face: This company makes packs with lots of places to hang and attach stuff, which could come in handy. Get a Big Shot (2,100 cubic inches, $89). thenorthface.com

Marmot: At 7,000 cubic inches (with a $400 price tag), the Astralplane is too big for your stated needs. But this pack, which can trace its evolutionary history to the mid-1980s, has long set the standard for load-carrying ability. It’s a classic. marmot.com

MontBell: This is what a stripped-down, minimalist pack that functions extremely well looks like. Get the Alpine Pack 50 (3,000 cubic inches, $199). montbell.com

There are other packs and makers out there, of course. But these cover the absolute state of the art in packs these days. You’re sure to get some terrific insights into what should constitute the next generation of load-hauling gear for the military.

You’ve seen our picks for 2007 Gear of the Year, and now the entire Outside Summer Buyer’s Guide is online. Check out this year’s more than 400 must-have gear items, including backpacks.

Ask a Question!

Our gear experts await your questions. Go ahead, ask them anything.

By submitting above, you agree to the Outside privacy policy. * We might edit your question for length or clarity.

0 Comments

Load More

Comments