I suggest you do some sort of Web search for news articles that relate directly to hunters' ability to distinguish between an elk, an elf ("Dang! I thought you said, there goes an elk!"), and a hiker. Here's one too-typical story that ran on Portland, Oregon's KVAL-13 news channel last month:
"Lane County detectives are continuing their investigation of a fatal hunting accident over the weekend. Neither hunter was wearing blaze orange, something that could have prevented the tragedy. Now 29-year-old [name removed] could face charges for shooting and killing his best friend...."
So, here's my advice: WEARING ORANGE HELPS. A lot. Most states require it, and those that do have reported significant decreases in hunting accidents since the rule went into effect.
Why can't hunters tell a human from a deer? I think it's because they (somenot all) see what they WANT to see. So do whatever you can to persuade them that what they are looking at is NOT a deer, bear, pheasant, or the like. I don't care if it does look dorkywear a vest.
Lead Photo: courtesy, Cabela's
Our mission to inspire readers to get outside has never been more critical. In recent years, Outside Online has reported on groundbreaking research linking time in nature to improved mental and physical health, and we’ve kept you informed about the unprecedented threats to America’s public lands. Our rigorous coverage helps spark important debates about wellness and travel and adventure, and it provides readers an accessible gateway to new outdoor passions. Time outside is essential—and we can help you make the most of it. Making a financial contribution to Outside Online only takes a few minutes and will ensure we can continue supplying the trailblazing, informative journalism that readers like you depend on. We hope you’ll support us. Thank you.
Contribute to Outside →