Are hydration bladders more trouble than they’re worth?

Sometimes the Gear Guy is completely taken aback by a question. This is one of those times. If I understand you correctly, the problem is that you can’t gauge when the bladder is nearing empty. Correct? But your friends with bottles know when their bottles are empty. Correct as well?

Well, no one makes a gauge that “tells" you when the bladder is empty. You fill it, you drink, and when you drink enough, it runs dry. If you ran out before your friends, that may be a good thing. It means you were drinking more (assuming you all started with equal amounts), thus staying more hydrated. It may also mean you are constantly sipping when you don’t really need to.

So, here’s a solution: Switch to a bottle.

I like hydration packs, and I use them especially for long mountain-bike treks when bottles are impractical. But how we became convinced we all need $100 canteens is a little beyond me. I still tend to adhere to regular bottles when hiking/backpacking, for the following reasons:
Easy to clean.
Easy to fill.
Sociable—you hike for an hour, find a shady spot, and everyone pulls out their bottles to have a drink and a chat.
Easy to tell when empty.
Can carry the king of juices, pineapple-orange-banana juice (try putting THAT in a hydration bladder, then cleaning it out).
Cheap!

Plus, I agree with your point about storing them in a pack. It can be a headache to pull out an empty bladder, and then wiggle a full one back in. That’s even the case in packs with dedicated slots. Another solution: Get a CamelBak UnBottle 100 ($35) and use its tie-down points to lash it to the outside of the pack.

Sometimes, simpler really is better.

The 2008 Summer Outside Buyer’s Guide is now online. From riding to trail-running to camping, get reviews of nearly 400 gear must-haves.