A U.S. federal court in Alaska has overturned a rule put in place by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that would protect over 187,000 miles of the state's coastline as designated critical polar bear habitat. The measure was put in place after the polar bear was added to the government's "threatened species" list in 2011. The judge's ruling was in response to a suit brought by the state of Alaska and the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, who claimed the designation was unnecessarily large.
While the judge said the federal rule was "valid in many respects," "procedural deficiencies" were ignored in its creation. The judge stated that once that USFWS followed procedure, it could be reinstated.
The Governor of Alaska praised the judge's decision saying that the development prohibition would hinder Alaska's economy.
Environmental activists saw the ruling as a minor obstacle. “The decision in the polar bear critical habitat case is a temporary setback for conservation,” Kassie Siegel of the Climate Law Institute told The Daily Caller. “However, we anticipate that critical habitat for the polar bear will be reinstated shortly, because the government can easily remedy the problems Judge Beistline identified in his decision and re-issue the rule.”
Support Outside Online
Our mission to inspire readers to get outside has never been more critical. In recent years, Outside Online has reported on groundbreaking research linking time in nature to improved mental and physical health, and we’ve kept you informed about the unprecedented threats to America’s public lands. Our rigorous coverage helps spark important debates about wellness and travel and adventure, and it provides readers an accessible gateway to new outdoor passions. Time outside is essential—and we can help you make the most of it. Making a financial contribution to Outside Online only takes a few minutes and will ensure we can continue supplying the trailblazing, informative journalism that readers like you depend on. We hope you’ll support us. Thank you.